IMPACT OF VOLTAGE ON ELECTROKINETIC REMEDIATED LEAD CONTAMINATED SOIL FOR USE AS ROAD BASE MATERIAL

John E. Sani, Seidu Tijani, Abdulazeez J. Rotimi, G. Moses

Abstract


Impact of voltage on electrokinetic remediated lead contaminated soil to determine the soil’s suitability for use as road base material was investigated in this research. Although, electrokinetic remediation method have proven to be more effective than most traditional techniques used in remediating low permeability soils contaminated with lead, there is still the problem of “the optimal voltage of the electrokinetic remediation process†that is most likely to produce the best result. The lead contaminated soil was remediated at 15V, 30V, 45V and 60V. At each voltage applied, index and geotechnical properties tests were conducted on the soils after remediation. Generally, the soil is non-plastic belonging to the A-4 group of soil. There is general improvement in all the geotechnical properties of the remediated soil. These improvements are maximum at 30V, there is little or no further improvement beyond this point. The CBR values indicated that none of the materials is suitable for use as road base material as the results do not satisfy the minimum 80% required. But the materials compacted using BSH met the minimum requirement of 40% CBR value and can be used as sub-base materials. Other results showed that the durability with resistances of 89% and 90% to loss in strength was recorded at 30V and 45V respectively, this, when compared to the resistance to loss in strength of 71% in un-remediated soil has respectively 25.3% and 26.8% durability advantages. It is recommended that 30V is just suitable for remediation purpose since less energy is used during the entire remediation process compared to 45V and 60V. All the UCS values failed to satisfy the 1700kN/m2 and 3000kN/m2 recommended for sub-base and base course materials respectively. With WAS compaction effort, the material remediated at 15V, 30V, 45V and 60V met the requirement of 80% resistance to loss in strength making the soil suitable for use as base course material.

 

KEYWORDS:  Electrokinetic remediation, heavy metal, contamination, California bearing ratio, unconfined compression strength, durability.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bimastyaji, S.R., Agus, J.E., Qomarudin, H. (2018). “Integrating electrokinetic and bioremediation process for treating oil contaminated low permeability soilâ€. E3S Web of Conference, 31,03005.

Dellisanti, (2016). “In-field remediation of tons of heavy metal-rich waste by Joule heating vitrificationâ€. Int. J. Miner. Process. 93, 239–245.

Douay, F., Pruvot, C., Roussel, H., Ciesielski, H., Fourrier, H., Proix, N., Waterlot, C. (2008). “Contamination of urban soils in an area of northern France polluted by dust emissions of two smeltersâ€. Water Air Soil Pollut. 188, 247–260.

Haruna, B.I., Adebayo, K., Sani, J.E., Moses, G., and Ibrahim, S.I. (2023). “Effect of ethanol and acetone cosolvents in enhancing electrokinetic remediation of crude oil contaminated soil obtained from a pipeline and storage company, Kaduna Nigeriaâ€. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage. 27(5) 933-937

Ingles, O.G., and Metcalf, J.B. (1973). “Soil stabilization: Principles and practiceâ€. Halsted Press, New York, N.Y.

Khalid, Sana and Shahid, Muhammad and Niazi, Nabeel Khan and Murtaza, Behzad and Bibi, Irshad and Dumat, Camille A. (2017). “Comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soilsâ€. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, vol. 182 (part B). pp. 247-268. ISSN 0375-6742

Lee, J.Y., Kwon, T.S., Park, J.Y., Choi, S., Kim, E.J., Lee, H.U., Lee, Y.C. (2016). “Electrokinetic (EK) removal of soil co-contaminated with petroleum oils and heavy metals in three-dimensional (3D) small-scale reactorâ€. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 99, 186–193.

Malavika G.J.S and Deepthy B.L. (2017). “Electrokinetic remediation of Lead-contaminated soilâ€. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, ETCEA 2017 Conference Proceedings

Mao, X., Han, F.X., Shao, X., Guo, K., McComb, J., Arslan, Z., Zhang, Z. (2016). “Electro-kinetic

remediation coupled with phytoremediation to remove lead, arsenic and cesium from contaminated paddy soilâ€. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 125, 16–24.

Minnikova, T.V., Denisova, T.V., Mandzhieva, S.S., Kolesnikov, S.I., Minkina, T.M., Chaplygin, V.A., Burachevskaya, M.V., Sushkova, S.N., Bauer, T.V. (2017). “Assessing the effect of heavy metals from the Novocherkassk power station emissions on the biological activity of soils in the adjacent areasâ€. J. Geochem. Explor. 174, 70–78.

Mohammed, H.E., Nuhu, D.M., Salihu, L., Alaadin, B. (2013). “Integrated electrokinetics-adsorption remediation of saline-sodic soils: effects of voltage gradient and contaminant concentration on soil electrical conductivityâ€. Sci. World J., http://dx.dol.org/10.1155/2013/618495

Murtaza, G., Murtaza, B., Niazi, K.N., Sabir, M., Ahmad, P., Wani, R.M., Azooz, M.M., Phan

Tran, L.-S. (2014). “Soil contaminants: sources, effects, and approaches for remediation. Improvement of Crops in the Era of Climatic Changesâ€. 2, pp. 171–196.

Navarro, A., Cardellach, E., Cañadas, I., Rodríguez, J. (2013). “Solar thermal vitrification of mining contaminated soilsâ€. Int. J. Miner. Process. 119, 65–74.

Nigerian General Specifications for Roads and Bridges (2016). Federal Ministry of Works, Abuja, Nigeria

Ola, S.A. (1974). “Need for estimated cement requirement for stabilizing lateritic soilâ€. Journal of Transportation Engineering of ASCE, 100(2), 378-388.

Page, M.M., Page, C.L. (2002). “Electroremediation of contaminated soilsâ€. J. Environ. Eng. 128, 208–219.

Reddy KR, Ala PR, Sharma S, Kumar SN. (2006). “Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of lead contaminated soilâ€. Sci. Technol., 85: 123-132.

Rosestolato, D., Bagatin, R., Ferro, S. (2015). “Electrokinetic remediation of soils polluted by heavy metals (mercury in particular)â€. Chem. Eng. J. 264, 16–23.

Rozas, F., Castellote, M. (2012). “Electrokinetic remediation of dredged sediments polluted with heavy metals with different enhancing electrolytesâ€. Electrochim. Acta 102–109.

Sabir, M., Waraich, E.A., Hakeem, K.R., Öztürk, M., Ahmad, H.R., Shahid, M. (2015). “Phytoremediation, Soil Remediation and Plantsâ€. Elsevier Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/B978-0-12-799937-1.00004-8.

Shahid, M., Dumat, C., Aslam, M., Pinelli, E. (2012). “Assessment of lead speciation by organic ligands using speciation modelsâ€. Chem. Speciat. Bioavailab. 24, 248–252.

Virkutyte, J., Sillanpaa, M., Latostenmaa, P. (2002). “Electrokinetic soil remediationâ€. critical overview. Sci. Total Environ. 289, 97–121.

Yang, L., Huang, B., Hu,W., Chen, Y.,Mao,M., Yao, L. (2015). “The impact of greenhouse vegetable farming duration and soil types on phytoavailability of heavy metals and their health risk in eastern Chinaâ€. Chemosphere 103, 121–130.

Yu, Y., Zhang, S., Huang, H., Luo, L.,Wen, B. (2009). “Arsenic accumulation and speciation in maize as affected by inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseaeâ€. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57, 3695–3701.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 JOURNAL OF INVENTIVE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (JIET)



Copyright  2020-2024. Journal of Inventive Engineering (JIET). All rights reserved. Nigerian Society of Engineers (NSE), Awka Branch.ISSN: 2705-3865

Powered by Myrasoft Systems Ltd.